He was pegged in the Oz media as a kiddie porn fetishist as early as 2005. THe 13 year old girl photo is a straight copy of victorian child pornography, the images are 1 for 1 if scaled, Henson is a copyist, he’s not original, it’s revolting stuff, it is just vomitable, he uses Australia as a ‘police free’ base, he can’t do it elsewhere. That Aiustralia’s shame, hick law enforcement, it is not whay you do, it is how many rich pals are going to bully people into letting you get away with it, it is also a form of OJ Simpsonism.

What, here is what I know, pimps, strip club owners, pedophiles and Bill Henson, will not risk going to law, they only have to lose once, and Bill has already been more lucky than his circumstances warrant. bill will be more interested in staying out of jail and hoping his LA, NYC and London visiting rights are repairable, he’s a lost cause for Cambodia.

So long as it is in prison and he is getting treatment, that’s fine by me.

It is also true, as a point of law.

Pretty good impression of 1880’s retro child pornography, he is many things, and original isn’t one of them. The rest of it is like Vogue from the 1980’s using naked kids, Henson has a fetish prob, the fetish however, was not of his design, it is only his addiction. Comparing him to an Italian master, only works if the person doing the comparing is a pedophile.

I do know, it is child pornography in London, so if he tries it there, we can put him in prison, which is where he belongs. There is not much we can do about Cambodia, Japan or Australia.

“No-one knows what was going on in Bill Henson’s mind.”

For London, that doesn’t really matter. If he took the photos, he brings them here, he’s guilty in the UK, it is that simple, it is child pornoraphy.

Whatever was in his head, is for the rehabilitation end of things.